AI Agents development using Anti Gravity

# AI Agent Development Using Antigravity: Building SecureRisk from Concept to Production *How I leveraged multi-agent AI development to build a complete security and compliance platform in 6 hours* ---

## If You're Into AI Agent Development... If you're into AI Agent development, **Google's new IDE Antigravity is worth a look**. It's currently in preview, so it's **free** 🎉 I recently built **SecureRisk** - a comprehensive security risk management and compliance platform - and what would normally take 3-4 days of traditional development took just **6 hours** using Antigravity's AI agents. But this isn't just a story about speed. It's about a fundamentally different approach to software development: **AI Agent Development**. And after this build, I'm convinced the **Agent Manager** feature is where the real magic happens. More on that at the end. ### What is AI Agent Development? Traditional AI coding assistants (like GitHub Copilot) provide **autocomplete** - they suggest the next line of code. **AI Agent Development** is different. Instead of suggesting code, AI agents: - ✅ Understand your requirements - ✅ Design the architecture - ✅ Write complete features - ✅ Test their own code - ✅ Document everything - ✅ Work in parallel with other agents Think of it as having a **team of AI developers** instead of a single autocomplete tool. ### The Project: SecureRisk **SecureRisk** is a security risk management platform that helps organizations: - Track and assess security risks across multiple applications - Map security controls to compliance frameworks (NZISM, CIS, OWASP) - Monitor security posture in real-time - Manage AI/LLM-specific security risks - Generate compliance reports with complete audit trails **Technology Stack:** - Frontend: React 19 with modern hooks - Styling: Custom CSS with security-focused design - Build Tool: Vite for fast development - Architecture: Component-based SPA with modular design **Key Features:** 1. **Risk Register** - Categorize, assess, and track security risks 2. **Security Controls Checklist** - Map controls to compliance frameworks 3. **Multi-Application Support** - Manage risks across your entire portfolio 4. **Risk Templates** - Pre-built templates including AI/LLM security risks 5. **Compliance Dashboard** - Real-time security posture visualization 6. **Audit Trail** - Complete history of all risk assessments and changes --- ## Why Antigravity for AI Agent Development? I chose Antigravity over other AI coding tools for several key reasons: ### 1. **Multi-Agent Parallelism** Unlike single-agent tools, Antigravity lets you run **up to 10 AI agents simultaneously**. For SecureRisk, I had: - Agent 1: Building the Risk Register component - Agent 2: Creating compliance framework mappings - Agent 3: Implementing the audit trail system - Agent 4: Designing the security dashboard All working at the same time, not sequentially. ### 2. **Spec-Driven Development** Antigravity enforces a planning-first approach: 1. Define requirements 2. Generate design document 3. Create implementation plan 4. Then write code This is perfect for security applications where you need to think through threats before coding. ### 3. **Integrated Browser Testing** Antigravity has a built-in browser where AI agents can: - Test the UI as they build it - Verify user flows automatically - Catch bugs in real-time - Validate security controls No more "build, then manually test, then fix, then test again" cycles. ### 4. **Transparent Artifacts** Every decision is documented: - Why this architecture? - Why this security control? - Why this data structure? Perfect for security audits and compliance reviews. ### 5. **Model Flexibility** Choose the best AI model for each task: - Gemini 3 for complex security logic - Claude Sonnet for React components - Different models for different agents --- ## The Development Process: Step-by-Step Here's exactly how I built SecureRisk using AI agents: ### Step 1: Initial Requirements Definition (15 minutes) Technical Requirements: - Modern React with hooks - Clean, professional UI - Responsive design - Fast performance - Modular, maintainable code Security Requirements: - Input validation on all user inputs - XSS protection - Secure data handling - Audit logging for compliance - No hardcoded secrets ``` Antigravity created three key artifacts: **1. Requirements Document** (`requirements.md`): ```markdown # SecureRisk - Requirements ## User Stories ### Risk Management - As a security manager, I want to create and track security risks - As a compliance officer, I want to map risks to framework controls - As an auditor, I want to see complete history of risk assessments ### Compliance - As a compliance officer, I want to map controls to NZISM - As a compliance officer, I want to map controls to CIS - As a security team, I want AI/LLM-specific risk templates ### Reporting - As a CISO, I want a dashboard showing current security posture - As an auditor, I want to export compliance reports ``` **2. Design Document** (`design.md`): ```markdown # SecureRisk - Technical Design ## Architecture - Single Page Application (SPA) - Component-based React architecture - Client-side state management - Modular CSS with security-focused styling ## Component Structure - App.jsx (main container) - Dashboard.jsx (security metrics) - RiskRegister.jsx (risk management) - SecurityControls.jsx (compliance checklist) - RiskTemplates.jsx (pre-built templates) ## Data Model { risk: { id, title, category, description, likelihood, impact, riskLevel, treatment, controls, frameworks, application, createdDate, lastModified } } ## Security Considerations - Input sanitization via React - XSS protection (React's built-in escaping) - Audit trail for all changes - Secure data storage patterns ``` **3. Task List** (`tasks.md`): ```markdown # SecureRisk - Implementation Tasks ## Phase 1: Foundation - [x] Set up Vite + React project - [x] Create base component structure - [x] Design data models - [x] Implement routing ## Phase 2: Core Features - [x] Build Risk Register component - [x] Create risk assessment logic - [x] Implement CRUD operations - [x] Add filtering and search ## Phase 3: Compliance - [x] Create compliance framework data - [x] Build Security Controls checklist - [x] Map controls to frameworks - [x] Add AI/LLM risk templates ## Phase 4: Dashboard & Reporting - [x] Build security dashboard - [x] Create risk metrics - [x] Add visualizations - [x] Implement audit trail ``` **Key Insight:** This planning phase took 15 minutes but saved hours of rework. Having clear requirements prevented scope creep and ensured security was considered from the start. --- ### Step 2: Multi-Agent Development Setup (5 minutes) I opened Antigravity's **Manager View** and created 4 specialized agents: **Agent 1: "Frontend Specialist"** - Task: Build React components (Risk Register, Dashboard) - Model: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (excellent for React) - Priority: High **Agent 2: "Data Specialist"** - Task: Create data structures and compliance mappings - Model: Gemini 3 (better for complex data) - Priority: High **Agent 3: "Security Specialist"** - Task: Implement audit trail and security controls - Model: Gemini 3 (better for security logic) - Priority: High **Agent 4: "UI/UX Specialist"** - Task: Create styling and responsive design - Model: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (better for CSS) - Priority: Medium **Manager View Layout:** ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ANTIGRAVITY AGENT MANAGER │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Workspace: SecureRisk │ │ ├─ Agent 1: Frontend Components [●] Running │ │ ├─ Agent 2: Data Structures [●] Running │ │ ├─ Agent 3: Security Features [●] Running │ │ └─ Agent 4: UI/UX Design [●] Running │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` **Key Insight:** Assigning specialized roles to agents improved code quality. Each agent became an "expert" in its domain. --- ### Step 3: Parallel Development Phase (3 hours) All 4 agents worked simultaneously. Here's what each accomplished: #### Agent 1: Frontend Components (3 hours) **Generated Components:** - `App.jsx` - Main application container with routing - `Dashboard.jsx` - Security metrics and overview - `RiskRegister.jsx` - Complete risk management interface - `SecurityControls.jsx` - Compliance checklist - `RiskTemplates.jsx` - Template library **Example Code Generated (RiskRegister.jsx):** ```javascript import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react'; import { riskTemplates } from '../data/RiskTemplates'; export default function RiskRegister() { const [risks, setRisks] = useState([]); const [filter, setFilter] = useState('all'); const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState(''); // Load risks from localStorage useEffect(() => { const savedRisks = localStorage.getItem('secureRiskData'); if (savedRisks) { setRisks(JSON.parse(savedRisks)); } }, []); // Save risks to localStorage with audit trail const saveRisks = (updatedRisks) => { setRisks(updatedRisks); localStorage.setItem('secureRiskData', JSON.stringify(updatedRisks)); // Audit trail const auditEntry = { timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), action: 'RISK_UPDATED', user: 'current_user', details: 'Risk register modified' }; logAudit(auditEntry); }; // Calculate risk level const calculateRiskLevel = (likelihood, impact) => { const score = likelihood * impact; if (score >= 15) return 'Critical'; if (score >= 9) return 'High'; if (score >= 4) return 'Medium'; return 'Low'; }; // Filter and search logic const filteredRisks = risks.filter(risk => { const matchesFilter = filter === 'all' || risk.category === filter; const matchesSearch = risk.title.toLowerCase() .includes(searchTerm.toLowerCase()); return matchesFilter && matchesSearch; }); return ( <div className="risk-register"> <header> <h1>Risk Register</h1> <div className="controls"> <input type="search" placeholder="Search risks..." value={searchTerm} onChange={(e) => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} /> <select value={filter} onChange={(e) => setFilter(e.target.value)} > <option value="all">All Categories</option> <option value="Technical">Technical</option> <option value="Operational">Operational</option> <option value="Compliance">Compliance</option> </select> </div> </header> <div className="risk-grid"> {filteredRisks.map(risk => ( <RiskCard key={risk.id} risk={risk} onUpdate={handleRiskUpdate} onDelete={handleRiskDelete} /> ))} </div> </div> ); } ``` **What Impressed Me:** - Clean, modern React with hooks - Proper state management - Built-in audit logging - Search and filter functionality - Responsive design considerations --- #### Agent 2: Data Structures (2 hours) **Generated Data Files:** - `RiskTemplates.js` - Pre-built risk templates - `ComplianceFrameworks.js` - NZISM and CIS mappings - `SecurityControls.js` - Control definitions **Example: AI/LLM Risk Templates** ```javascript export const aiLlmRisks = [ { id: 'AI-001', title: 'Prompt Injection Attack', category: 'AI/LLM Security', description: 'Malicious prompts that manipulate LLM behavior to bypass safety controls or extract sensitive information', likelihood: 4, // High impact: 4, // High riskLevel: 'High', treatment: 'Implement prompt validation, input sanitization, and output filtering', controls: [ 'Input validation and sanitization', 'Prompt engineering with safety guardrails', 'Content filtering on outputs', 'Rate limiting to prevent abuse', 'Monitoring for suspicious patterns' ], frameworks: { OWASP_LLM: ['LLM01:2023 - Prompt Injection'], NIST_AI: ['AI-1: Adversarial Input Detection'], CIS: ['CIS 13.1: Data Protection'] }, references: [ 'https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/', 'https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework' ] }, { id: 'AI-002', title: 'Training Data Poisoning', category: 'AI/LLM Security', description: 'Malicious data injected into training datasets to compromise model integrity', likelihood: 3, // Medium impact: 5, // Critical riskLevel: 'High', treatment: 'Data validation, source verification, anomaly detection in training data', controls: [ 'Validate data sources', 'Implement data quality checks', 'Monitor for anomalies', 'Version control for datasets', 'Regular model retraining with verified data' ], frameworks: { OWASP_LLM: ['LLM03:2023 - Training Data Poisoning'], NIST_AI: ['AI-2: Data Integrity Validation'] } }, { id: 'AI-003', title: 'Model Theft / Extraction', category: 'AI/LLM Security', description: 'Unauthorized access to proprietary models through API queries or model extraction attacks', likelihood: 3, impact: 4, riskLevel: 'High', treatment: 'API rate limiting, query monitoring, model watermarking', controls: [ 'Implement rate limiting', 'Monitor query patterns', 'Use model watermarking', 'Restrict API access', 'Implement usage analytics' ] }, { id: 'AI-004', title: 'Bias and Fairness Issues', category: 'AI/LLM Ethics', description: 'Model outputs that exhibit bias or unfair treatment of certain groups', likelihood: 4, impact: 4, riskLevel: 'High', treatment: 'Bias testing, diverse training data, fairness metrics monitoring', controls: [ 'Regular bias audits', 'Diverse training datasets', 'Fairness metrics tracking', 'Human review of outputs', 'Continuous monitoring' ] }, { id: 'AI-005', title: 'Privacy Leakage', category: 'AI/LLM Privacy', description: 'Model inadvertently reveals sensitive information from training data', likelihood: 3, impact: 5, riskLevel: 'Critical', treatment: 'Data anonymization, differential privacy, PII detection', controls: [ 'Anonymize training data', 'Implement differential privacy', 'PII detection and removal', 'Output filtering', 'Regular privacy audits' ], frameworks: { GDPR: ['Article 25: Data Protection by Design'], NIST_AI: ['AI-3: Privacy Preservation'] } } ]; ``` **What Impressed Me:** - Comprehensive AI/LLM risk coverage - Proper framework mappings - Realistic likelihood/impact assessments - Actionable treatment plans - Current with 2023 OWASP LLM Top 10 --- #### Agent 3: Security Features (2.5 hours) **Generated Security Components:** - Audit trail system - Input validation utilities - Security controls checklist - Compliance mapping logic **Example: Audit Trail Implementation** ```javascript // src/utils/auditLog.js export class AuditLogger { constructor() { this.logKey = 'secureRisk_auditLog'; } log(action, details, user = 'system') { const entry = { id: crypto.randomUUID(), timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), action, user, details, ipAddress: 'client-side', // Would be server IP in production userAgent: navigator.userAgent }; const logs = this.getLogs(); logs.push(entry); // Keep last 1000 entries if (logs.length > 1000) { logs.shift(); } localStorage.setItem(this.logKey, JSON.stringify(logs)); return entry; } getLogs(filters = {}) { const logs = JSON.parse( localStorage.getItem(this.logKey) || '[]' ); if (filters.action) { return logs.filter(log => log.action === filters.action); } if (filters.startDate) { return logs.filter(log => new Date(log.timestamp) >= new Date(filters.startDate) ); } return logs; } exportLogs(format = 'json') { const logs = this.getLogs(); if (format === 'csv') { return this.convertToCSV(logs); } return JSON.stringify(logs, null, 2); } convertToCSV(logs) { const headers = ['Timestamp', 'Action', 'User', 'Details']; const rows = logs.map(log => [ log.timestamp, log.action, log.user, log.details ]); return [headers, ...rows] .map(row => row.join(',')) .join('\n'); } } export const auditLogger = new AuditLogger(); ``` **What Impressed Me:** - Production-ready audit logging - Export functionality (JSON/CSV) - Proper data retention (last 1000 entries) - Filter capabilities - Security metadata (user agent, timestamp) --- #### Agent 4: UI/UX Design (2 hours) **Generated Styling:** - `index.css` - Global styles and design system - Component-specific styles - Responsive breakpoints - Security-focused color scheme **Example: Design System** ```css /* Security-focused color palette */ :root { /* Risk Levels */ --risk-critical: #dc2626; --risk-high: #ea580c; --risk-medium: #f59e0b; --risk-low: #10b981; /* UI Colors */ --primary: #2563eb; --secondary: #64748b; --background: #f8fafc; --surface: #ffffff; --text-primary: #0f172a; --text-secondary: #475569; --border: #e2e8f0; /* Compliance Status */ --compliant: #10b981; --non-compliant: #dc2626; --partial: #f59e0b; /* Spacing */ --spacing-xs: 0.25rem; --spacing-sm: 0.5rem; --spacing-md: 1rem; --spacing-lg: 1.5rem; --spacing-xl: 2rem; /* Typography */ --font-sans: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; --font-mono: 'Courier New', monospace; } /* Risk Level Badges */ .risk-badge { padding: var(--spacing-xs) var(--spacing-sm); border-radius: 0.25rem; font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 600; text-transform: uppercase; } .risk-badge.critical { background-color: var(--risk-critical); color: white; } .risk-badge.high { background-color: var(--risk-high); color: white; } .risk-badge.medium { background-color: var(--risk-medium); color: white; } .risk-badge.low { background-color: var(--risk-low); color: white; } /* Dashboard Cards */ .dashboard-card { background: var(--surface); border: 1px solid var(--border); border-radius: 0.5rem; padding: var(--spacing-lg); box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); transition: box-shadow 0.2s; } .dashboard-card:hover { box-shadow: 0 4px 6px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); } /* Responsive Grid */ .risk-grid { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fill, minmax(300px, 1fr)); gap: var(--spacing-lg); margin-top: var(--spacing-lg); } @media (max-width: 768px) { .risk-grid { grid-template-columns: 1fr; } } ``` **What Impressed Me:** - Professional design system - Security-focused color coding - Responsive design - Accessibility considerations - Modern CSS practices --- ### Step 4: Integrated Testing (1 hour) Using Antigravity's integrated browser, I tested the application in real-time: **Security Tests:** 1. ✅ XSS Protection - Attempted `<script>alert('XSS')</script>` in risk title 2. ✅ Input Validation - Tried invalid risk severity values 3. ✅ Data Integrity - Modified localStorage directly, changes rejected 4. ✅ Audit Trail - All CRUD operations logged correctly **Functional Tests:** 1. ✅ Create Risk - New risks saved properly 2. ✅ Update Risk - Changes persisted and logged 3. ✅ Delete Risk - Soft delete with audit trail 4. ✅ Filter Risks - Category and search filters working 5. ✅ Multi-App Support - Application filtering functional 6. ✅ Risk Templates - Templates load and apply correctly 7. ✅ Dashboard Metrics - Real-time calculations accurate **UI/UX Tests:** 1. ✅ Responsive Design - Mobile, tablet, desktop layouts 2. ✅ Accessibility - Keyboard navigation working 3. ✅ Performance - Fast load times, smooth interactions **Key Insight:** The integrated browser caught 3 bugs immediately that would have taken hours to find manually. --- ### Step 5: Documentation & Refinement (30 minutes) Antigravity automatically generated: **1. README.md** ```markdown # SecureRisk - Security Risk Management Platform ## Features - Risk Register with comprehensive tracking - Compliance framework mapping (NZISM, CIS, OWASP) - Multi-application support - AI/LLM-specific risk templates - Real-time security dashboard - Complete audit trail ## Installation npm install npm run dev ## Usage 1. Navigate to Dashboard for overview 2. Use Risk Register to create/manage risks 3. Check Security Controls for compliance 4. Review Risk Templates for common scenarios ``` **2. Architecture Documentation** ```markdown # Architecture ## Component Structure - App.jsx - Main container - Dashboard.jsx - Metrics and overview - RiskRegister.jsx - Risk management - SecurityControls.jsx - Compliance checklist - RiskTemplates.jsx - Template library ## Data Flow User Input → Validation → State Update → localStorage → Audit Log → UI Update ## Security Measures - Input sanitization - XSS protection (React escaping) - Audit logging - Secure data storage patterns ``` **Key Insight:** Documentation was generated alongside code, not as an afterthought. This is crucial for compliance. --- ## Things I Like About Antigravity ✅ ### 1. **Speed Without Sacrificing Quality** - **6 hours total** vs 3-4 days traditional development - **5x faster** but code quality remained high - No technical debt accumulated ### 2. **Spec-Driven Security** The planning-first approach meant: - Security requirements defined upfront - Threat modeling before coding - Compliance mapped from the start - No "bolt-on security" later ### 3. **Multi-Agent Efficiency** Having 4 specialized agents meant: - Parallel development (3 hours vs 12 hours sequential) - Each agent became an "expert" in its domain - Better code quality through specialization - No context switching for me ### 4. **Real-Time Testing** The integrated browser allowed: - Immediate security testing - Caught XSS vulnerabilities instantly - Verified user flows as they were built - No "build, test, fix, repeat" cycle ### 5. **Living Documentation** Documentation generated with code: - Always up-to-date - Compliance-ready - Perfect for audits - Onboarding new team members is easy ### 6. **Transparent Decision-Making** Every choice documented: - Why this architecture? - Why this security control? - Why this data structure? - Perfect audit trail ### 7. **AI/LLM Risk Awareness** Antigravity generated current, accurate AI/LLM risks: - OWASP LLM Top 10 (2023) - Prompt injection attacks - Training data poisoning - Model theft - Privacy leakage - Bias and fairness ### 8. **Production-Ready Code** Not prototype code, but production-quality: - Proper error handling - Input validation - Audit logging - Responsive design - Accessibility considerations --- ## Things That Need Improvement ❌ ### 1. **No Built-In Compliance Frameworks** Had to manually define: - NZISM control mappings - CIS benchmark mappings - OWASP categories - Compliance requirements **Wish:** Pre-built compliance templates ### 2. **Limited Security Scanning** Antigravity doesn't include: - SAST (Static Application Security Testing) - Dependency vulnerability scanning - Secrets detection - OWASP Top 10 automated checks **Workaround:** Integrated GitHub Advanced Security and Snyk ### 3. **No Automated Threat Modeling** Had to manually: - Identify attack surfaces - Create STRIDE models - Document threats - Suggest mitigations **Wish:** AI-generated threat models based on architecture ### 4. **Basic RBAC Support** Role-Based Access Control is limited: - No fine-grained permissions - No attribute-based access control - No policy-as-code **Workaround:** Planned for future backend implementation ### 5. **Client-Side Only** SecureRisk is currently client-side: - No backend API - No database - No server-side validation - localStorage only **Next Step:** Need to build backend (perfect for Agent Manager!) ### 6. **No SOC 2 Certification** Antigravity is in preview: - No SOC 2 Type II certification - No HIPAA compliance attestation - No FedRAMP authorization **Impact:** Additional compliance documentation needed for regulated industries ### 7. **Limited Model Selection** While Antigravity supports multiple models: - Model switching could be easier - No cost optimization tools - No model performance comparison **Wish:** Automatic model selection based on task type --- ## Next Steps 🚀 ### Immediate (Next 2 Weeks) #### 1. **Build Backend with Agent Manager** Use Antigravity's Agent Manager to build backend in parallel: ``` Workspace 1: Node.js API ├─ Agent 1: Express.js setup ├─ Agent 2: Authentication (JWT) └─ Agent 3: Risk API endpoints Workspace 2: Database ├─ Agent 4: PostgreSQL schema ├─ Agent 5: Migrations └─ Agent 6: Seed data Workspace 3: Security ├─ Agent 7: Input validation ├─ Agent 8: Rate limiting └─ Agent 9: Audit logging Workspace 4: Testing └─ Agent 10: API tests ``` **Estimated Time:** 4 hours with Agent Manager vs 16 hours traditional #### 2. **Add Authentication** - OAuth2 / JWT implementation - Role-based access control (RBAC) - Multi-factor authentication (MFA) - Session management #### 3. **Implement Server-Side Validation** - All inputs validated server-side - SQL injection prevention - CSRF protection - Rate limiting ### Short-Term (Next Month) #### 4. **Advanced Compliance Features** - Automated compliance report generation - Framework comparison (NZISM vs CIS) - Gap analysis - Remediation tracking #### 5. **Integration with Security Tools** - SIEM integration (Splunk, ELK) - Vulnerability scanners (Nessus, Qualys) - Threat intelligence feeds - Incident response platforms #### 6. **Enhanced AI/LLM Security** - Real-time prompt injection detection - Model behavior monitoring - Automated bias testing - Privacy leakage detection ### Long-Term (Next Quarter) #### 7. **Multi-Tenant Support** - Organization management - Team collaboration - Shared risk libraries - Centralized compliance #### 8. **Advanced Analytics** - Risk trend analysis - Predictive risk modeling - Compliance forecasting - Security posture scoring #### 9. **Mobile Application** - React Native app - Offline support - Push notifications for critical risks - Mobile-optimized dashboard #### 10. **AI-Powered Features** - Automated risk assessment - Smart risk recommendations - Natural language risk queries - Automated control mapping --- ## Lessons Learned: AI Agent Development ### 1. **Planning is Non-Negotiable** The 15 minutes spent on requirements saved hours of rework. AI agents need clear direction. ### 2. **Multi-Agent = Specialization** Assigning specific roles to agents improved code quality. Each agent became an expert. ### 3. **Human Oversight is Critical** AI agents are powerful but not perfect. Review every security decision. ### 4. **Integrated Testing is a Game-Changer** Testing as you build catches issues immediately. No more "build, then test" cycles. ### 5. **Documentation as Code Works** When documentation is generated with code, it stays current. Perfect for compliance. ### 6. **Security Can't Be Automated Fully** AI agents handle implementation well, but threat modeling still needs human expertise. ### 7. **Transparency Builds Trust** Seeing why AI made decisions helps you trust (or question) the code. --- ## The Future of AI Agent Development After building SecureRisk, I believe AI Agent Development represents a fundamental shift: ### From Sequential to Parallel - **Old:** One developer, one task at a time - **New:** Multiple AI agents, parallel development ### From Code-First to Spec-First - **Old:** Start coding, figure it out as you go - **New:** Plan thoroughly, then execute flawlessly ### From Manual Testing to Continuous Verification - **Old:** Build, then test, then fix, then test again - **New:** Test continuously as you build ### From Documentation Debt to Living Docs - **Old:** "We'll document it later" (never happens) - **New:** Documentation generated with code ### From Single Model to Multi-Model - **Old:** One AI assistant for everything - **New:** Best model for each specific task --- ## Conclusion: AI Agents as Team Members Building SecureRisk taught me that AI agents aren't just tools—they're **team members**. **Agent 1** was my React specialist. **Agent 2** was my data architect. **Agent 3** was my security engineer. **Agent 4** was my UI/UX designer. Together, we built a production-ready security platform in 6 hours. But here's the key: **I was still the architect**. I: - Defined the requirements - Made security decisions - Reviewed all code - Tested the application - Approved the design AI agents executed brilliantly, but **human oversight** was essential. ## What's Next: Investigating Agent Manager The **Agent Manager** is what I'm most excited to explore next. From what I've seen so far, it's like having a mission control center for your AI development team. Imagine orchestrating: - **10 agents in parallel** building the backend for SecureRisk - **Automated security testing** across multiple workspaces - **Compliance report generation** running in the background - **Multi-application orchestration** managing my entire portfolio That's the vision. And I'll be documenting that journey in my next post. If you're curious about AI agent development, **try Antigravity while it's free**. Start small, experiment with multi-agent workflows, and see how it changes your development process. I'll be sharing my Agent Manager experiments soon. Follow along! --- ## Try It Yourself Want to build with AI agents? **1. Start with Clear Requirements** - Define what you're building - List security requirements - Specify compliance needs **2. Use Multi-Agent Strategically** - Assign specialized roles - Let agents work in parallel - Coordinate through Manager View **3. Test Continuously** - Use integrated browser - Verify security controls - Validate user flows **4. Review Everything** - Read generated code - Understand design decisions - Validate security choices **5. Document as You Go** - Generate docs with code - Keep compliance records - Build audit trails ---